Madame Gaston, His Little Wife

posted 4 days ago with 52 notes

cause-andaffection:

Main Street Electrical Parade



hip-hip-poohray:

Disney Cereals! 

HUNNY Bs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AND MUD&BUGS!




speenatch asked: "Oops! I hadn't said what I meant to. The writer created the connection to Tarzan in that same Reddit post. I'm pretty sure he said it as a joke on the crazy ideas people come up with, but obviously people really took it to heart."

OHHH, I really hope he said it as a joke BECAUSE IT MAKES ABSOLUTELY ZERO SENSE.

posted 4 days ago with 1 note

thedisneyprincessposts:

Vintage Disney Land :)

MICKEY? DALE?

DOLAN NO.


the-unpopular-opinions:

The Disney Princess arguments are seriously the stupidest and most hypocritical discussions I’ve seen on this site. Everytime a new princess movies happens everyone complains that it’s another movie showing that girls can’t be anything but royalty and when they make a normal movie with a female lead they complain it’s a missed opportunity to make other princess film. When the princess is white they complain she isn’t of color and when she is they complain “They are doing this just so they don’t look racist” which is exactly what happened with Princess and the Frog.
Then finally after the movie is out everyone acts like all previous criticisms never existed and over analyzes every frame to death to try to make it look like it’s the greatest thing since sliced bread while literally ignoring any flaws the film actually has, refusing to take any real criticism.
But the saddest thing I see when it comes to the princesses is that this is an argument that I’ve seen only in the Disney fandom. I’ve yet to ever see anyone complain about the lack of female protagonists and racial representation from any other animation studio like Dreamworks and they are doing more or less the same thing: making children’s movies!
Make an argument and stick with it!

the-unpopular-opinions:

The Disney Princess arguments are seriously the stupidest and most hypocritical discussions I’ve seen on this site. Everytime a new princess movies happens everyone complains that it’s another movie showing that girls can’t be anything but royalty and when they make a normal movie with a female lead they complain it’s a missed opportunity to make other princess film.
When the princess is white they complain she isn’t of color and when she is they complain “They are doing this just so they don’t look racist” which is exactly what happened with Princess and the Frog.

Then finally after the movie is out everyone acts like all previous criticisms never existed and over analyzes every frame to death to try to make it look like it’s the greatest thing since sliced bread while literally ignoring any flaws the film actually has, refusing to take any real criticism.

But the saddest thing I see when it comes to the princesses is that this is an argument that I’ve seen only in the Disney fandom. I’ve yet to ever see anyone complain about the lack of female protagonists and racial representation from any other animation studio like Dreamworks and they are doing more or less the same thing: making children’s movies!

Make an argument and stick with it!



speenatch asked: "The Frozen/Little Mermaid theory was cooked up by one of the writers of Frozen during their AMA on Reddit. Someone had asked about where the king and queen were headed, I think."

Well I know that they were headed to Rapunzel’s wedding, which I get. It took me a while to believe the Little Mermaid theory, but given the timeline, it makes sense. BUT THE TARZAN ONE WILL NEVER MAKE SENSE AND I WISH IT’D STOP.

posted 4 days ago with 6 notes

Anonymous asked: "What's the the little mermaid/frozen theory? :)"

Well you know the whole thing with Rapunzel and Flynn attending Elsa’s coronation is because they’re cousins and three years earlier Anna and Elsa’s parents were going to attend Rapunzel’s homecoming and wedding. Anyways, the theory is that when the ship sank, that’s the ship that Ariel finds the dinglehopper in at the beginning of The Little Mermaid.

AND THEN IT GOES OFF LIKE “OH, THEY DIDN’T ACTUALLY DIE. THEY WASHED UP ON THE SHORE IN AFRICA???? AND THEN HAD A BABY??? AND WERE KILLED BY A CHEETAH???” 

No.

posted 4 days ago with 12 notes

disneyprince:

I’m wishing…

disneyprince:

I’m wishing…


spookbubbles:

y0ualreadykn0ww:

sunnyfuckingdisposition:

I know it’s fucked up, but I really routed for this bitch when I was little.

its not fucked up because sharpay was just trying to chase her dream and be the bEST SHE CAN BE BUT GABRIELLA CAME OUTTA NO WHERE LIKE LOL HEHE TROY LETS DO ALL THE MUSICALS FOR SHITS AND GIGGLES AND KEPT TAKING SHARPAYS DREAM AWAY FROM HER rude ass bitch

And sharpays songs were SO MUCH BETTER TOO THEY WERE FUN AND GABRIELLA JUST SANG ALL SLOW ABOUT LOVE AND SHE MADE YOU WANT TO FALL ASLEEP BUT SHARPAYS MUSIC WAS THE SHIT

spookbubbles:

y0ualreadykn0ww:

sunnyfuckingdisposition:

I know it’s fucked up, but I really routed for this bitch when I was little.

its not fucked up because sharpay was just trying to chase her dream and be the bEST SHE CAN BE BUT GABRIELLA CAME OUTTA NO WHERE LIKE LOL HEHE TROY LETS DO ALL THE MUSICALS FOR SHITS AND GIGGLES AND KEPT TAKING SHARPAYS DREAM AWAY FROM HER rude ass bitch

And sharpays songs were SO MUCH BETTER TOO THEY WERE FUN AND GABRIELLA JUST SANG ALL SLOW ABOUT LOVE AND SHE MADE YOU WANT TO FALL ASLEEP BUT SHARPAYS MUSIC WAS THE SHIT


OKAY SO

I get that the whole Tangled/Frozen thing is PRACTICALLY canon because they take place in pretty much the exact same time period. And The Little Mermaid takes place in around the 1830s, about fifty years later, so I guess I can see that. I’m warming up to that idea.

BUT THE TARZAN THING, REALLY?

Tarzan takes place between 1880-1910, somwhere in that range. I’ll give everyone the benefit of the doubt and say 1880. When they die, Anna and Elsa’s parents are probably at least 40. So they were born in about 1740. Let’s even say that Tarzan was about 30 in the movie and was born in 1850.

YOU GUYS ARE TRYING TO TELL ME THAT ANNA AND ELSA’S PARENTS HAD ANOTHER BABY WHEN THEY WERE 110 YEARS OLD?

I DON’T THINK SO.

posted 4 days ago with 35 notes